top of page

Graviton

Composition :  

Statistics :

Family :

Symbol :  

Mass : 

Decay :

Electric charge : 

Color charge

Spin :

Weak isospin

Weak hypercharge :

Elementary particle

Bosonic

Gauge boson

G

0

see [0]

0 e 

none  

0  [2] [3]

±1

0

Hypothetic Graviton in the Standard Model [2]

 

The gravitational force can be considered to have existed from the very beginning of the universe, as it is one of the fundamental forces of nature. However, it is not until the universe has cooled enough and the densities of matter have become high enough that gravity becomes the dominant force in shaping the structure of the universe.

During the radiation-dominated era, which lasted from about 10^-43 seconds to about 10^-11 seconds after the Big Bang, the universe was so hot and dense that the radiation was the dominant force, and the gravitational force had little effect on the distribution of matter.

It is not until the matter-dominated era, which began after the electroweak epoch [T] , that the gravitational force becomes important in shaping the structure of the universe.

 

As the universe expanded and cooled, matter began to clump together under the influence of gravity, leading to the formation of galaxies, stars, and planets. The first structure that we can identify as being formed by the gravitational force is the cosmic microwave background radiation which was formed at about 380,000 years after the Big Bang, so we can say that the first time we can speak about gravitational force in the history of the universe is around that point.

In-depth reading

Recent Developments

Graviton in the String Theory [2]

String theory predicts the existence of gravitons and their well-defined interactions. A graviton in perturbative string theory is a closed string in a very particular low-energy vibrational state. The scattering of gravitons in string theory can also be computed from the correlation functions in conformal field theory, as dictated by the AdS/CFT correspondence, or from matrix theory.[citation needed]

A feature of gravitons in string theory is that, as closed strings without endpoints, they would not be bound to branes and could move freely between them. If we live on a brane (as hypothesized by brane theories), this "leakage" of gravitons from the brane into higher-dimensional space could explain why gravitation is such a weak force, and gravitons from other branes adjacent to our own could provide a potential explanation for dark matter. However, if gravitons were to move completely freely between branes, this would dilute gravity too much, causing a violation of Newton's inverse-square law. To combat this, Lisa Randall found that a three-brane (such as ours) would have a gravitational pull of its own, preventing gravitons from drifting freely, possibly resulting in the diluted gravity we observe, while roughly maintaining Newton's inverse square law.  [5]  See brane cosmology.

A theory by Ahmed Farag Ali and Saurya Das adds quantum mechanical corrections (using Bohm trajectories) to general relativistic geodesics. If gravitons are given a small but non-zero mass, it could explain the cosmological constant without need for dark energy and solve the smallness problem.  [6]   The theory received an Honorable Mention in the 2014 Essay Competition of the Gravity Research Foundation for explaining the smallness of cosmological constant.  [7]  Also the theory received an Honorable Mention in the 2015 Essay Competition of the Gravity Research Foundation for naturally explaining the observed large-scale homogeneity and isotropy of the universe due to the proposed quantum corrections.  [8]

In-Depth reading

References

  1. Sushkov, A. O.; Kim, W. J.; Dalvit, D. A. R.; Lamoreaux, S. K. (2011). "New Experimental Limits on Non-Newtonian Forces in the Micrometer Range". Physical Review Letters. 107 (17): 171101. arXiv:1108.2547. Bibcode:2011PhRvL.107q1101S. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.171101. PMID 22107498. S2CID 46596924. It is remarkable that two of the greatest successes of 20th century physics, general relativity and the standard model, appear to be fundamentally incompatible. But see also Donoghue, John F. (2012). "The effective field theory treatment of quantum gravity". AIP Conference Proceedings. 1473 (1): 73. arXiv:1209.3511. Bibcode:2012AIPC.1483...73D. doi:10.1063/1.4756964. S2CID 119238707. One can find thousands of statements in the literature to the effect that "general relativity and quantum mechanics are incompatible". These are completely outdated and no longer relevant. Effective field theory shows that general relativity and quantum mechanics work together perfectly normally over a range of scales and curvatures, including those relevant for the world that we see around us. However, effective field theories are only valid over some range of scales. General relativity certainly does have problematic issues at extreme scales. There are important problems which the effective field theory does not solve because they are beyond its range of validity. However, this means that the issue of quantum gravity is not what we thought it to be. Rather than a fundamental incompatibility of quantum mechanics and gravity, we are in the more familiar situation of needing a more complete theory beyond the range of their combined applicability. The usual marriage of general relativity and quantum mechanics is fine at ordinary energies, but we now seek to uncover the modifications that must be present in more extreme conditions. This is the modern view of the problem of quantum gravity, and it represents progress over the outdated view of the past

  2. Wikipeida based

  3. For a comparison of the geometric derivation and the (non-geometric) spin-2 field derivation of general relativity, refer to box 18.1 (and also 17.2.5) of Misner, C. W.; Thorne, K. S.; Wheeler, J. A. (1973). Gravitation. W. H. Freeman. ISBN 0-7167-0344-0.

  4. OpenStax University Physics. Authored by: OpenStax CNX. Located at: https://cnx.org/contents/1Q9uMg_a@10.16:Gofkr9Oy@15. License: CC BY: Attribution. License Terms: Download for free at http://cnx.org/contents/d50f6e32-0fda-46ef-a362-9bd36ca7c97d@10.16

  5. Kaku, Michio (2006) Parallel Worlds – The science of alternative universes and our future in the Cosmos. Doubleday. pp. 218–221. ISBN 978-0385509862.

  6. Ali, Ahmed Farag (2014). "Cosmology from quantum potential". Physics Letters B. 741: 276–279. arXiv:1404.3093

  7. Das, Saurya (2014). "Cosmic coincidence or graviton mass?". International Journal of Modern Physics D. 23 (12): 1442017.

  8. Das, Saurya (2015). "Bose–Einstein condensation as an alternative to inflation". International Journal of Modern Physics D. 24 (12): 1544001–219

bottom of page